Sales Compensation & Incentive Design

Sales Compensation & Incentive Design

Sales Compensation & Incentive Design

Design Reward Systems That Drive Performance and Align Pay with Revenue Outcomes

A well-designed sales incentive compensation plan goes beyond paying commissions. It's a comprehensive strategy that influences behavior, drives performance, and shapes your organization's sales culture.


Sales incentive compensation is a strategic approach to rewarding sales professionals based on their performance and contribution to revenue goals. Unlike fixed-salary roles, sales incentive compensation includes a variable component directly tied to individual and team achievements against assigned quotas. This creates a win-win scenario in which salespeople are financially rewarded for their success, which, in turn, contributes to the company's overall success.


Yet, despite well-designed plans on paper, their execution often falls short, with strategies that fail to translate into practice. Quotas, when set without thorough analysis, can inadvertently foster fairness issues among teams. Accelerators intended to reward top performers can create windfalls, creating disparities rather than motivation. Moreover, pay structures that overlook quota bands risk unfairly penalizing reps, further disrupting the intended harmony of compensation systems.


We design compensation programs that motivate the right behaviors, reward performance fairly, and can be administered without creating operational chaos.

Our Services

Our Services

What you get

A Comprehensive diagnostic of your current compensation programs that identifies gaps, risks, and opportunities across all elements of your sales comp framework.

When you need this

  • Compensation programs haven't been refreshed in 2+ years

  • Retention issues or fairness complaints are emerging

  • Planning significant GTM changes requiring comp redesign

  • New leadership wants an objective assessment before changes

Our Approach

  • Current plan analysis across all design elements using the Sales Compensation Growth Model framework

  • Pay-for-performance analytics: quota attainment distribution, payout curves, pay mix effectiveness

  • Field surveys and stakeholder interviews (sales leadership, reps, finance, HR)

  • Benchmark analysis against Radford and industry-specific data

  • Root cause identification that traces symptoms to underlying design issues

Deliverables

  • Comprehensive assessment report with findings across Corporate, Operational, and Comp Plan elements

  • Pay-for-performance analytics dashboard

  • Benchmark comparison showing market position by role

  • Prioritized recommendation roadmap with quick wins and strategic initiatives

  • Executive presentation with business case for changes

Timeline: 4-8 weeks, depending on organization complexity

Benchmarking & Career Architecture

Benchmarking & Career Architecture

What You Get

Market-competitive pay structures and career progression frameworks ensuring you attract and retain top talent while maintaining internal equity.

When You Need This

  • Losing candidates or employees due to compensation issues

  • Unclear career progression paths that create retention issues

  • Geographic expansion that requires regional pay strategies

  • Role proliferation without a clear leveling structure

Our Approach

  • Job matching and market data selection using Radford and industry surveys

  • Career architecture design with clear levels, competencies, and progression criteria

  • Pay range development balancing external competitiveness with internal equity

  • Regional pay strategy for multi-geography organizations

  • Transition planning for employees moving into the new structure

Deliverables

  • Career architecture framework with job levels and role definitions

  • Market benchmarking report by role and level showing 50th, 75th, and 90th percentiles

  • Salary range structure with guidelines for hiring, promotions, and adjustments

  • Geographic differential strategy (if applicable)

  • Individual pay analysis and transition recommendations

  • Communication materials explaining the new structure to employees

Timeline: 3-5 weeks for design; implementation phased over 1-2 quarters

Sales Incentive Compensation Design

Sales Incentive Compensation Design

What You Get

Complete sales compensation plan design from strategy through detailed mechanics, ensuring plans motivate the right behaviors and can be administered effectively.

When You Need This

  • Launching new sales roles or restructuring existing ones

  • Current plans are not driving desired behaviors

  • Sales strategy changed, but comp plans haven't

  • Quota attainment shows systemic issues (too high/low, unfair distribution)

Our Approach Using the Sales Compensation Growth Model

The RevEng Sales Compensation Growth Model emphasizes the interconnectedness of compensation elements across three levels. You can have perfect corporate strategy alignment and excellent guiding principles, but if the operational implementation doesn't work, the program will fail. Most consultants start and stop with comp plan mechanics. We connect every element to upstream strategic considerations and operational realities.

Corporate Level Alignment

  • Customer segmentation and GTM strategy integration

  • Talent strategy and role design connection

  • Budget and financial modeling to ensure cost management while driving desired behaviors

  • Regulatory and compliance review

Operational Design

  • Sales process alignment with natural measurement and incentive points

  • Organizational structure determining individual versus collective measurement

  • Comp administration and governance framework

  • Territory design and quota setting methodology creating fair, achievable goals

  • System and tool requirements for calculation and reporting

Comp Plan Mechanics (10 Essential Elements)

These ten compensation plan components must integrate with strategic foundation and operational realities:


1. Role Eligibility: Which positions participate in variable compensation programs? Focus on where incentives meaningfully influence performance.


2. Pay Architecture & OTE: Compensation structure, market positioning, and target earnings. Create clarity for talent acquisition and retention. Benchmarked against Radford and industry data.


3. Pay Mix: Base versus variable compensation ratio balancing risk and stability (e.g., 50/50, 60/40, 70/30). Match to business model, talent needs, level of persuasion, and sales cycle.


4. Performance Measures: What gets measured and rewarded to drive desired outcomes. Measure what matters, not what's easy. Where possible, one role focuses on one sales motion. When multiple measures are needed, limit to 3 with no measure less than 20% weighting.


5. Pay Curves & Thresholds: Performance-to-payout relationship and minimum levels. Design curves showing threshold (minimum performance for payout), target (100% of quota), and excellence (top 10% performance). Motivate across the performance spectrum.


6. Accelerator Rates: Enhanced rewards for exceptional performance above target. Derived from company performance data and benchmarks for how you want to pay top performers. Balance rewards with business economics.


7. Performance Period & Payout: Measurement timing and payment frequency decisions. Balance motivation, administration, and compliance. Align with sales cycle length and cash flow considerations.


8. Crediting Rules: How sales credit is allocated in team selling environments. Design for collaboration, not competition. Complex in at-risk revenue models like media or consumption-based pricing.


9. Out of Plan Elements: Flexibility mechanisms for unique situations like new hire guarantees, role transitions, and territory changes. Build in flexibility with strong controls.


10. Special Incentives: Targeted programs for strategic priorities, including SPIFs (Sales Performance Incentive Funds), contests, and recognition programs. Use sparingly for actual strategic needs. Should complement, not complicate core plans.

These ten compensation plan components must integrate with strategic foundation and operational realities:


1. Role Eligibility: Which positions participate in variable compensation programs? Focus on where incentives meaningfully influence performance.


2. Pay Architecture & OTE: Compensation structure, market positioning, and target earnings. Create clarity for talent acquisition and retention. Benchmarked against Radford and industry data.


3. Pay Mix: Base versus variable compensation ratio balancing risk and stability (e.g., 50/50, 60/40, 70/30). Match to business model, talent needs, level of persuasion, and sales cycle.


4. Performance Measures: What gets measured and rewarded to drive desired outcomes. Measure what matters, not what's easy. Where possible, one role focuses on one sales motion. When multiple measures are needed, limit to 3 with no measure less than 20% weighting.


5. Pay Curves & Thresholds: Performance-to-payout relationship and minimum levels. Design curves showing threshold (minimum performance for payout), target (100% of quota), and excellence (top 10% performance). Motivate across the performance spectrum.


6. Accelerator Rates: Enhanced rewards for exceptional performance above target. Derived from company performance data and benchmarks for how you want to pay top performers. Balance rewards with business economics.


7. Performance Period & Payout: Measurement timing and payment frequency decisions. Balance motivation, administration, and compliance. Align with sales cycle length and cash flow considerations.


8. Crediting Rules: How sales credit is allocated in team selling environments. Design for collaboration, not competition. Complex in at-risk revenue models like media or consumption-based pricing.


9. Out of Plan Elements: Flexibility mechanisms for unique situations like new hire guarantees, role transitions, and territory changes. Build in flexibility with strong controls.


10. Special Incentives: Targeted programs for strategic priorities, including SPIFs (Sales Performance Incentive Funds), contests, and recognition programs. Use sparingly for actual strategic needs. Should complement, not complicate core plans.

These ten compensation plan components must integrate with strategic foundation and operational realities:


1. Role Eligibility: Which positions participate in variable compensation programs? Focus on where incentives meaningfully influence performance.


2. Pay Architecture & OTE: Compensation structure, market positioning, and target earnings. Create clarity for talent acquisition and retention. Benchmarked against Radford and industry data.


3. Pay Mix: Base versus variable compensation ratio balancing risk and stability (e.g., 50/50, 60/40, 70/30). Match to business model, talent needs, level of persuasion, and sales cycle.


4. Performance Measures: What gets measured and rewarded to drive desired outcomes. Measure what matters, not what's easy. Where possible, one role focuses on one sales motion. When multiple measures are needed, limit to 3 with no measure less than 20% weighting.


5. Pay Curves & Thresholds: Performance-to-payout relationship and minimum levels. Design curves showing threshold (minimum performance for payout), target (100% of quota), and excellence (top 10% performance). Motivate across the performance spectrum.


6. Accelerator Rates: Enhanced rewards for exceptional performance above target. Derived from company performance data and benchmarks for how you want to pay top performers. Balance rewards with business economics.


7. Performance Period & Payout: Measurement timing and payment frequency decisions. Balance motivation, administration, and compliance. Align with sales cycle length and cash flow considerations.


8. Crediting Rules: How sales credit is allocated in team selling environments. Design for collaboration, not competition. Complex in at-risk revenue models like media or consumption-based pricing.


9. Out of Plan Elements: Flexibility mechanisms for unique situations like new hire guarantees, role transitions, and territory changes. Build in flexibility with strong controls.


10. Special Incentives: Targeted programs for strategic priorities, including SPIFs (Sales Performance Incentive Funds), contests, and recognition programs. Use sparingly for actual strategic needs. Should complement, not complicate core plans.

Top Performer Framework

Two critical concepts determine whether compensation plans motivate appropriately:


Top Pay Performer Pay: The percent of target variable pay that is paid to the top 10% performing rep (example: 2.5x their target variable pay). This is determined by role scope, activities, and pay mix. A 50/50 pay mix role typically has 2.5x leverage; a 70/30 pay mix role typically has 1.75x leverage.


Top Pay Performer Attainment: The percentage of quota attainment achieved by the top 10% performing rep (example: 120% quota attainment). This is based on internal performance data and may need to be determined by quota bands.


Quota Bands: Quota size has the most significant impact on performance. We plot quota size versus quota attainment, looking for "funneling" where data narrows—indicating natural band boundaries. Pay curves change by quota size to normalize pay across top performers, ensuring fairness.

Two critical concepts determine whether compensation plans motivate appropriately:


Top Pay Performer Pay: The percent of target variable pay that is paid to the top 10% performing rep (example: 2.5x their target variable pay). This is determined by role scope, activities, and pay mix. A 50/50 pay mix role typically has 2.5x leverage; a 70/30 pay mix role typically has 1.75x leverage.


Top Pay Performer Attainment: The percentage of quota attainment achieved by the top 10% performing rep (example: 120% quota attainment). This is based on internal performance data and may need to be determined by quota bands.


Quota Bands: Quota size has the most significant impact on performance. We plot quota size versus quota attainment, looking for "funneling" where data narrows—indicating natural band boundaries. Pay curves change by quota size to normalize pay across top performers, ensuring fairness.

Two critical concepts determine whether compensation plans motivate appropriately:


Top Pay Performer Pay: The percent of target variable pay that is paid to the top 10% performing rep (example: 2.5x their target variable pay). This is determined by role scope, activities, and pay mix. A 50/50 pay mix role typically has 2.5x leverage; a 70/30 pay mix role typically has 1.75x leverage.


Top Pay Performer Attainment: The percentage of quota attainment achieved by the top 10% performing rep (example: 120% quota attainment). This is based on internal performance data and may need to be determined by quota bands.


Quota Bands: Quota size has the most significant impact on performance. We plot quota size versus quota attainment, looking for "funneling" where data narrows—indicating natural band boundaries. Pay curves change by quota size to normalize pay across top performers, ensuring fairness.

Quota Setting Philosophy

Three approaches exist. We recommend Strategic Performance Balance:


  • Maximum Achievement Approach (100% attainment): Easily achievable targets for maximum participation. Diminishes the strategic value of incentive compensation.


  • Strategic Performance Balance (55-60% attainment): Challenging yet attainable objectives aligned with business growth. Drives continuous improvement. Fosters an achievement culture. This is best practice.


  • Extreme Challenge Model (minimal attainment): Extraordinary performance thresholds that risk talent retention and engagement.

Three approaches exist. We recommend Strategic Performance Balance:


  • Maximum Achievement Approach (100% attainment): Easily achievable targets for maximum participation. Diminishes the strategic value of incentive compensation.


  • Strategic Performance Balance (55-60% attainment): Challenging yet attainable objectives aligned with business growth. Drives continuous improvement. Fosters an achievement culture. This is best practice.


  • Extreme Challenge Model (minimal attainment): Extraordinary performance thresholds that risk talent retention and engagement.

Three approaches exist. We recommend Strategic Performance Balance:


  • Maximum Achievement Approach (100% attainment): Easily achievable targets for maximum participation. Diminishes the strategic value of incentive compensation.


  • Strategic Performance Balance (55-60% attainment): Challenging yet attainable objectives aligned with business growth. Drives continuous improvement. Fosters an achievement culture. This is best practice.


  • Extreme Challenge Model (minimal attainment): Extraordinary performance thresholds that risk talent retention and engagement.

Deliverables

  • Sales compensation philosophy and guiding principles document

  • Complete plan design document with all mechanics detailed across Corporate, Operational, and Comp Plan levels

  • Financial modeling showing cost scenarios and ROI projections

  • Quota setting methodology and distribution approach with quota bands

  • Plan terms and conditions documentation

  • Calculator tools for reps to model earnings scenarios

  • Governance framework and policy documentation

  • Implementation roadmap with phasing and timeline

  • Sales compensation philosophy and guiding principles document

  • Complete plan design document with all mechanics detailed across Corporate, Operational, and Comp Plan levels

  • Financial modeling showing cost scenarios and ROI projections

  • Quota setting methodology and distribution approach with quota bands

  • Plan terms and conditions documentation

  • Calculator tools for reps to model earnings scenarios

  • Governance framework and policy documentation

  • Implementation roadmap with phasing and timeline

  • Sales compensation philosophy and guiding principles document

  • Complete plan design document with all mechanics detailed across Corporate, Operational, and Comp Plan levels

  • Financial modeling showing cost scenarios and ROI projections

  • Quota setting methodology and distribution approach with quota bands

  • Plan terms and conditions documentation

  • Calculator tools for reps to model earnings scenarios

  • Governance framework and policy documentation

  • Implementation roadmap with phasing and timeline

Timeline: 4-8 weeks, depending on the number of roles and plan complexity

Sales Incentive Compensation Governance

Sales Incentive Compensation Governance

What You Get

Governance structures, policies, and operating rhythms that ensure compensation programs run smoothly and adapt appropriately over time.

When You Need This

  • Comp plan disputes consume leadership time

  • Inconsistent exception handling creates fairness issues

  • No straightforward process for quota changes or adjustments

  • Plan effectiveness is not being measured

  • Need structure before rolling out new plans

Our Approach

Quota-setting is a team sport—and without clear roles, it can undermine your talent and financial goals. The best organizations build governance committees made up of senior leaders from Sales, Finance, and Operations. These committees own the process design, timeline, methodology, and final signoff.

Good governance means clear decision rights (who decides, who informs, who executes), transparent timelines and expectations, a repeatable process (not fire drills), and built-in checks from cross-functional stakeholders.

Governance Structure Design

  • Global Sales Incentive Compensation Governance Board: Approves all compensation plans, exceptions, quotas, and disputes. 

  • Quota-Setting Governance Committee: Establishes quota-setting process and timeline, provides final recommendation on individual-level quotas. 

  • Global Sales Incentive Compensation Design Committee: Provides final design for sales comp plans and analyzes plan effectiveness. 

  • Sales Incentive Compensation Administration: Manages day-to-day admin, owns plan dissemination, and commissions payouts.

Policy Development

  • Exception management policies and approval workflows (counter-offers, off-cycle adjustments, windfall protection)

  • Dispute resolution process and escalation protocols

  • Crediting policies for complex scenarios

  • Clawback and guarantee policies for new hires and role changes

  • Territory and account assignment change procedures

  • SPIFF governance framework for short-term incentives

Operating Cadence

  • Quarterly business review framework tracking plan effectiveness

  • Annual planning calendar and process timeline

  • Monthly/quarterly payout review and approval process

  • Plan effectiveness metrics and reporting requirements

Deliverables

  • Governance charter with committee structure and decision rights (RACI framework)

  • Exception management policies and approval workflows

  • Dispute resolution process and escalation protocols

  • Quarterly business review framework and templates

  • Plan effectiveness metrics and reporting dashboards

  • Annual planning calendar showing all key dates and milestones

  • Policy documentation covering all scenarios (crediting, adjustments, exceptions)

  • Governance charter with committee structure and decision rights (RACI framework)

  • Exception management policies and approval workflows

  • Dispute resolution process and escalation protocols

  • Quarterly business review framework and templates

  • Plan effectiveness metrics and reporting dashboards

  • Annual planning calendar showing all key dates and milestones

  • Policy documentation covering all scenarios (crediting, adjustments, exceptions)

  • Governance charter with committee structure and decision rights (RACI framework)

  • Exception management policies and approval workflows

  • Dispute resolution process and escalation protocols

  • Quarterly business review framework and templates

  • Plan effectiveness metrics and reporting dashboards

  • Annual planning calendar showing all key dates and milestones

  • Policy documentation covering all scenarios (crediting, adjustments, exceptions)

Timeline: 4-6 weeks for framework design; ongoing advisory support for 1st year

Sales Comp Plan Rollout & Communication

Sales Comp Plan Rollout & Communication

What You Get

A complete change management and enablement program that ensures comp plans are understood, trusted, and drive adoption.

When You Need This

  • Rolling out new or significantly changed compensation plans

  • Historical rollouts resulted in confusion and resistance

  • Need to build trust in the fairness of new programs

  • Want high adoption and behavior change, not just compliance

  • First time implementing significant comp changes

Our Approach Using The Rollout Framework

Successful compensation plan implementation requires all stakeholders—from executives to individual contributors—to understand the mechanics and believe in the strategic alignment. 


  • Planning Phase: Establish communication strategies, training materials, and administrative setup for foundation building.

  • Activation Phase: Execute communication plans, deliver manager and employee training, and implement system activation for launch.

  • Optimization Phase: Collect feedback, measure adoption and performance, and continually refine processes and systems for improvement.


This streamlined overview highlights our strategic approach to planning, launching, and optimizing initiatives efficiently.

Deliverables


Communication Materials Checklist:

  • Executive Level: CEO/CRO announcement memo, strategic rationale deck, town hall presentation, executive talking points

  • Leadership Cascade: Regional leader scripts, department-specific decks, Q&A response guide, email templates

  • Individual Communications: Plan summary documents, role-specific examples, FAQ documents, acknowledgment forms


Enablement Materials:

  • Training Content: Manager certification program, self-paced learning modules, video tutorials library, role-play scenarios

  • Tools & Calculators: Compensation calculators, goal-setting worksheets, what-if scenario tools, mobile app resources

  • Reference Materials: Plan design documents, terms & conditions, policy guidelines, quick reference guides


Support Infrastructure:

  • Help desk procedures and support team training

  • Knowledge base/wiki with searchable content

  • Office hours schedule and FAQ compilation

  • Feedback collection and continuous improvement process

Timeline: 2 weeks planning, 4-6 weeks rollout execution, 90 days post-launch support and optimization

How These Services Connect

How These Services Connect

Most organizations start with Compensation Strategy & Assessment to understand the current state, then move into Sales Incentive Compensation Design for the new programs. Benchmarking & Career Architecture often run in parallel to ensure market competitiveness. Governance is established during or immediately after design. Rollout & Communication happens once the design is complete.


We can also deliver services individually based on your needs. Already have a plan designed, but need help with rollout? Start there. Need governance without redesigning everything? We can do that too.

Common Engagement Paths

Full Transformation: Assessment Design Governance Rollout (12-20 weeks)

Focused Redesign: Assessment Design Rollout (8-12 weeks)

Implementation Support: Governance Rollout (6-8 weeks for existing designs)

Quick Assessment: Strategy & Assessment only (2-4 weeks for diagnostic and roadmap)

How We Work

How We Work

How We Work

The 4D Framework

The 4D Framework

We partner with you through implementation using our proven 4D Framework—ensuring compensation programs don't just exist on paper, but deliver measurable outcomes.

Diagnose: Comprehensive Current State Assessment

  • Deep diagnostic work using a multi-lens approach


  • Historical trend analysis and AI-driven pattern recognition


  • Stakeholder engagement across sales, finance, HR, and operations


  • Root cause identification, not just surface symptoms

Design: Co-Create Practical Solutions

  • Strategic planning workshops defining success criteria


  • Solution development across all three levels of the Compensation Growth Model


  • Financial modeling ensuring cost-neutrality or controlled impact


  • Co-creation ensures alignment, buy-in, and a realistic foundation for execution

Deploy: Structured Implementation

  • Implementation governance with clear decision rights and escalation paths


  • Change management activation with communications and enablement


  • Field enablement through training, tools, and ongoing support


  • Real-time monitoring and rapid issue resolution

Decode: Continuous Optimization

  • Performance monitoring with KPI tracking and dashboards


  • Plan effectiveness assessment and adjustment recommendations


  • Quarterly business reviews with the governance committee


  • ROI measurement and value validation

Who We Work With

Who We Work With

Chief Revenue Officers who need compensation programs that align with the GTM strategy and drive desired behaviors

VP Sales who face retention issues, fairness complaints, or misaligned incentives

Compensation & HR Leaders who design or need to refresh sales comp programs

CFOs who are focused on cost control and pay-for-performance ROI

Private Equity Operating Partners who want to standardize compensation within or across portfolio companies

What to Expect

What to Expect

Improved Performance Alignment

Plans that motivate the right behaviors and reward outcomes that matter

Reduced Turnover

Market-competitive pay structures and fair quota distribution improve retention of top performers

Administrative Efficiency

Clear policies, governance structures, and systems reduce disputes and administrative burden

Transparent Programs

Plans that reps understand and trust, with visibility into pacing and earnings

Cost Predictability

Financial modeling ensures compensation costs align with revenue performance

Faster Implementation

Structured rollout frameworks reduce time-to-adoption and minimize disruption

Featured Results

Featured Results

Featured Results

Career Architecture & Accelerator Program

Exponential growth required evolving sales roles and compensation plans. Created new career architecture for core selling roles benchmarked competitively, and regional pay mix strategy. Designed a new accelerator program that was cost-neutral but had considerably more upside for high performers through differentiated quota bands and accelerator rates. Quota performance im

Global Health Company: End-to-End Sales Transformation

30% new revenue goal with competing hypotheses about roles and compensation. Comprehensive assessment including field surveys, high performer personas, and ten core pay-for-performance analytics. Delivered new career architecture, accelerator program, updated segmentation model, new competency model, and improved sales results through role specialization.

Haribo: Direct & Partner Compensation Restructure

Restructured direct and partner compensation programs to make plans market competitive and improve partner revenue. Comprehensive review isolated three major pain points and delivered updated programs that improved partner engagement and revenue contribution.

Related Resources

Related Resources

Related Resources

Sales Compensation Growth Model - Our comprehensive three-level framework for integrated compensation design

Growth Excellence Model (GEM) - Our comprehensive framework, including the People & Rewards pillar

Revenue Growth Strategy & Execution - The strategy that compensation should support

[BLOG LINK: "Sales Incentive Compensation: A Primer"]

[BLOG LINK: Quota Setting methodology]

[BLOG LINK: Market Competitiveness]

Ready to Fix Your Compensation?

Sales compensation that's fair, motivating, and administratively feasible doesn't happen by accident. It requires deep expertise in plan design, quota methodology, governance, and change management.


Which service do you need? Not sure? Start with a Compensation Strategy & Assessment to clarify priorities.

Get started on a project today

Reach out below and we'll get back to you as soon as possible.

©2025 All Rights Reserved RevEng Consulting

CHICAGO | HOUSTON | LOS ANGELES

Get started on a project today

Reach out below and we'll get back to you as soon as possible.

©2025 All Rights Reserved RevEng Consulting

CHICAGO | HOUSTON | LOS ANGELES

Get started on a project today

Reach out below and we'll get back to you as soon as possible.

©2025 All Rights Reserved RevEng Consulting

CHICAGO | HOUSTON | LOS ANGELES